Posts Tagged :

    Development

    Adam Hesse

    Stirling Prize award proves good housing design is possible everywhere, says Aston Mead

    526 315 Aston Mead Land and Planning | Land with development potential across Surrey

    Leading land agent Aston Mead says the award of the RIBA Stirling Prize for Architecture to a development of council houses in Norfolk is proof that good design is possible for properties in all price brackets.

    Goldsmith Street in Norwich became the first social housing project ever to win the prize from the Royal Institute of British Architects. Judges described the development of 105 homes as a ‘modest masterpiece’ and ‘an outstanding contribution to British architecture’.

    Aston Mead Land & Planning Director Adam Hesse said: “For too long we’ve put up with the excuse that good design is too costly to be applied to lower value homes. But what happened in Norwich has put the lie to that argument at a stroke. This is quite a modest development of 50 one, two and four bedroom flats, together with a similar number of two-bedroom houses – but now it has been recognised as a pioneering example for other local authorities to follow.”

    The properties in Goldsmith Street have been built to eco-friendly ‘Passivhaus’ standards – ultra-low energy buildings which need little fuel for heating or cooling. Over a quarter of the site is communal space – lushly-planted, with a secure alleyway connecting neighbours at the bottom of their garden fences.

    Adam Hesse says that a similar approach can be found at the Prince of Wales’s new town of Poundbury on the outskirts of Dorchester, Dorset, which started in 1993 and is expected to be completed by 2025.

    He explains: “Poundbury demonstrates that it is possible to build high-quality housing at affordable prices. Around a third of the housing there is being built by housing associations for rental or shared equity ownership by people on the local housing list. But just as in Goldsmith Street, emphasis is placed on the quality of design and materials, landscaping, and attention to detail – even down to street furniture and signage.

    “However, crucially at Poundbury, there is no zoning. The social housing is interspersed with – and indistinguishable from – the private housing nearby. This is just the way it should be. When quality runs throughout the development, rather in privileged ‘pockets’, not only do those residents tend to take more care of their properties, but the private homes nearby prefer to have them as neighbours as well.

    “Previously, people may have thought that it was only kudos and publicity generated by the Prince of Wales’ connection with Poundbury that allowed such a development to take place. But as the houses at Goldsmith Street in Norwich prove, the truth is that good design should be possible everywhere.

    “In fact, with ambition, careful thought, and attention to detail, there is no reason why similar examples of high quality design for properties in all price brackets should not now be created all over the UK.”

    Small site planning delays ‘stall the engine’ of UK development, says Aston Mead

    526 320 Aston Mead Land and Planning | Land with development potential across Surrey

    Leading land agents Aston Mead say that planning delays of over a year are forcing individual building projects to be abandoned, and slowing UK development overall.

    Director Adam Hesse says that decisions over even the most modest-sized sites are taking an unacceptably long time to bring to conclusion, forcing some small and medium sized developers out of business.

    He explained: “Small, brownfield sites in our towns and villages are often unearthed by SME developers. But quick turnover even for these more modest locations is prevented by a planning process which is clunky, time consuming and not fit for purpose.

    “The trouble is, local planning authorities encourage a pre-application meeting on all sites before planning is submitted. But meetings often can’t be arranged for two months or more – and even when they do see the applicants, they seem unwilling to give any meaningful direction or advice.”

    “It’s often the case that this means people are submitting an application without knowing if the planning department will approve of what is being proposed. Then it takes six to eight weeks to register, and another eight weeks to be heard. So just on the main application, six months can potentially go by without getting any decision whatsoever. And if it goes to appeal, staff shortages mean that there’s a minimum of an additional six months before the case can be heard.”

    Adam Hesse cites a planning enquiry submitted by one of his clients to the district council on 1 May this year. The council replied saying that because ‘workloads are very high’, there was no guarantee that it could provide a response by 26 June – a full eight weeks later – saying ‘we would appreciate your patience if we are unable to do so.’

    He adds: “So even if developers pull out all the stops, it can still take between 8 and 14 months to get a decision on even smallish sites. Delays like this stall the engine room of SME developers, and UK development in general.

    “Local authorities are always telling us that there simply are not enough staff to handle the volume of enquiries that they are receiving. Employees are being run ragged, which leads them becoming de-motivated, which increases the chance of people leaving, and so the problem continues.

    “Council planning departments need to be provided with more funding to cope with the workloads they are currently under. Only then will we be able to return the housing market to full capacity.

    “Indeed, the current Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), which is consulting with boroughs across the UK about releasing greenbelt for development, would have a far easier job if these smaller brownfield sites could be fast-tracked through the planning process. That way, targets would be more easily achieved, which would reduce the need for the release of additional greenbelt. Everyone wins.”

    Aston Mead backs report advocating development of 45,000 homes in UK high streets

    526 320 Aston Mead Land and Planning | Land with development potential across Surrey

    Leading Surrey & Berkshire land agents Aston Mead is throwing its weight behind a new report which suggests that thousands of new homes could be delivered across the UK by developing vacant space in high streets.

    The report, ‘Making Sense of Mixed-Use Town Centres’ produced by planning and development consultancy Turley, says that there is currently around 8 million square metres of unused floorspace across the UK’s urban centres, and that even if only a third of it was apportioned to residential development, some 45,000 homes could be delivered.

    Aston Mead Land & Planning Director Charles Hesse said: “People often bemoan the vast areas of empty space in our high streets. But we should see this is as an opportunity rather than a problem. If we started creating new properties where there are currently vacant buildings, thousands of homes could be created.

    “What’s more, that figure of 45,000 new homes assumes that any new building would not be carried out above the level of existing properties. If planning regulations were relaxed to allow even a modest increase in height, then an even higher number of new homes could be created.”

    Charles Hesse also says that town centres need to embrace mixed-use development in order to thrive. He explained: “We should stop seeing high streets solely as places to shop, and start to recognise them as potential residential centres as well. There are plenty of people who would love to live right in the heart of the action, and having more people move into our town centres would turn them into more vibrant and dynamic areas.

    “We’ve all had the experience of walking through high streets in the evening, only to find them deserted, resembling ghost towns, with no real activity until the start of the next working day. They can feel unsafe and unloved, and are hardly enjoyable places to visit.

    “By contrast, more people living in the middle of towns would mean that they would continue to be lively even after the shops were closed, helping footfall in local pubs, theatres and restaurants. Having more people around would make them safer, turn them into desirable destinations after dark, and at last breathe life back into our town centres.”

    Social Housing

    Aston Mead says councils betting £100m a month on property market should spend it on affordable homes instead

    526 320 Aston Mead Land and Planning | Land with development potential across Surrey

    Leading land agent Aston Mead has hit out at the practice of local councils betting on the commercial property market, saying that they should spend the money building affordable homes on their own land instead.

    Land & Planning Director Adam Hesse was speaking out after it was revealed that despite guidelines which are supposed to limit the practice, local authorities are still spending £100m every month buying retail centres, shops and offices, chasing returns to replace revenue lost in government cuts.

    He said: “Not only is it an unnecessary risk to bet taxpayers money in this way, but the authorities concerned are spending vast amounts of money on assets which may not be worth anything like what they are paying for them.

    “Local authorities may be able to borrow at low interest rates from the Public Works Loans Board, but there are no limits to how much they can borrow, and they don’t even have to prove that they can afford it. Consequently, the risks of councils finding themselves over-exposed are enormous.

    “What’s more, they could borrow the money to build affordable homes on their own land and rent them out to tenants on their waiting list. The return from doing so would certainly be better than some of the assets they are buying at the moment, and waiting lists would be reduced at the same time. It’s a win / win solution!”

    In the last year, councils have spent a total of £1.8bn on such purchases, and more than £3bn since 2013. In April this year, the government instructed councils to take more care to avoid risk, following warnings that demand for retail space was falling and rents were stagnating.

    Adam Hesse added: “This is local government – none of them experts in commercial property investment – gambling taxpayers’ money on buildings which are regularly situated hundreds of miles away from their local area, and often bought at huge multiples of their annual income. It would only take prices to fall slightly, and they would find themselves with a serious problem.

    “When it comes to low grade shopping centres and department stores, councils are the buyer of last resort because these are precisely the sorts of properties that no one else wants. So if these so-called ‘investments’ were overvalued when they bought them, goodness knows how much less they are worth now.

    “Meanwhile, there are swathes of council-owned land across the country, which could be put to good use building much-needed affordable homes, meaning the councils could keep hold of their assets, at much lower risk and at higher returns than gambling on sub-standard investments on the commercial property market.”